Jemba does two things only: spot what falls outside the ordinary, and find the operating range that holds. The three workflows below follow from that, and each one rests on a client deployment whose figures are published.
“Does a serious stop start within the next hour?”
“Out of hundreds of variables, which ones actually matter?”
“Where should the line run so the yield holds?”
Workflows 02 and 03 rest on the same case, rubber and polymer: the variables were screened first, then the operating range was drawn. Workflow 01 rests on the aerospace and defence case. We do not add a workflow until it has a published blind test of its own.
| Workflow | Published case | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01 · Anomaly detection | Aerospace & defence | 273 h |
| 02 · Process optimisation | Rubber & polymer | 977 → 10 variables |
| 03 · Process optimisation | Rubber & polymer | +9.5 pts |
We read the export you already produce and tell you within a week whether it carries the levers.